| 翻訳と辞書 |
| A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F.Supp.2d 896 ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (2000)
''A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.'', 114 F.Supp.2d 896 (2000), was the district court case which preceded the landmark intellectual property case of ''A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.'', 239 F.3d 1004 (2001). The case was heard by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Napster appealed this case to United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
==Procedural background==
Plaintiffs alleged both contributory and vicarious copyright infringement by Napster, and soon filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the exchange of plaintiffs' songs on the service immediately.
In defense, Napster cited ''Sony v. Universal City Studios'' for the argument that (1) the users of its system were engaging in fair use and (2) the Napster software was capable of substantial non-infringing use. Napster also alleged (3) a First Amendment objection to the injunction, claiming it suppressed free speech.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (2000)」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|